Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Feb 25, 2009
  2. Feb 11, 2009
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      Various fixes for the lv4 backend: · 672af392
      Erwan Jahier authored
       - expr such as "current x,y" should be written "current (x,y)"
       - abstract   struct  or   array   types  were   handled  as   extern
         types, which  prevent the struct  and array expanser to  work them
         out. In order to fix that, I have added an Abstract_type_eff variant
         to Eff.type_ which contains the concerte type.
      672af392
  3. Feb 10, 2009
  4. Feb 09, 2009
  5. Feb 06, 2009
  6. Feb 04, 2009
  7. Feb 03, 2009
  8. Jan 30, 2009
  9. Dec 12, 2008
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      Break the recursivity is the Eff.node_exp representation (which fix nested iter. pbs). · 5c722d86
      Erwan Jahier authored
      In  short, the  rationale for  this change,  is that  it is  having a
      recursive node_exp is
      - useless,
      - too complicated,
      - wrong w.r.t. nesting iterator calls
      
      In long:
      
      - It is useless because, at the  Eff level, a node cannot call itself
        via one  of its  static arg (which  was where the  recursivity came
        from).
      
      - and indeed, it  is much simpler to consider that  a static arg node
        can only be ident.long that identifies a node alias.
      
        This  means of  course, that  nested iterators  have  been unnested
        before,   inventing  alias   node  names   along  the   way...  And
        polymorphism makes thing difficult once again.
      
      - But the  *big* problem  with a recursive  node_exp is that  it make
        things very  complicated to (lic)dump nested  iterator call because
        of polymorphism!   Actually, it  even makes thing  complicated when
        the iterators were themselves not nested in the source code !
      
        Some ugly  things were done in  LicDump to unnest  those calls when
        printing node_exp.   But this uglyness  have a price:  tricky code,
        and bugs! Indeed, nested iterators calls were wong for example when
        using  the --inline-iterator  mode (but  i would  not  be surprised
        that is wrong in other cases...).
      
      Hence,  LicDump  is  simpler,  but  of course  LazyCompiler  is  more
      complicated.  But  this  is  reasonable:  a  pretty-printer  is  not
      supposed to be complicated.
      5c722d86
  10. Nov 28, 2008
  11. Nov 25, 2008
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      Replace constants by their values. · 3f2aa6c4
      Erwan Jahier authored
      The rationale for this change is that this is necessary for constants
      appearing static  arg to  be replaced. One  problem is that  they are
      handled in exactly  the same way as top-level  constants, which could
      be left  un-expanded. I could make  something in order  to not expand
      those top-levelconstants, but is it worth the trouble ?
      
      To do that,  I have changed sligthly the  representation of Eff.ARRAY
      (the elements  are now  attached to the  constructor itself,  and the
      operands  is empty)  and  the one  of  array constant  (we attach  to
      Array_const_eff  a  list  instead  of  an  array,  for  the  sake  of
      homogeneity) with what is done in Eff.val_eff.
      3f2aa6c4
  12. Nov 03, 2008
  13. Oct 24, 2008
  14. Sep 15, 2008
  15. Sep 02, 2008
  16. Sep 01, 2008
  17. Aug 29, 2008
  18. Aug 28, 2008
  19. Aug 25, 2008
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      Unnest array iterator calls by modifying the Lic printer. · 65c62005
      Erwan Jahier authored
      The  idea  is  the  following:  each  time  a  nested  iterator  call
      (map<<map<<n,3>>,4>>) is  encountered, we  create a fresh  alias name
      (create_alias_name) ad we  add it in the node_alias_tbl.   At the end
      of the  compilation, LicDump.dump_node_alias is  called, which prints
      the definition of those node aliases.
      
      For example, the expression  "map<<map<<n,3>>,4>>" is printed like this:
      
          map<<_node_alias1, 4>>
      
      and later, the node alias is defined:
      
          node _node_alias1(x:int) returns(y:int); let y = map<<n,3>>(x); tel;
      65c62005
  20. Aug 21, 2008
  21. Aug 19, 2008
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      Split expressions into atomic expressions. In other words, introduce · d7905aff
      Erwan Jahier authored
      as many  new local  variables as necessary  so that an  expression is
      made at most of one operator.
      
      The rational  for that  is to obtain  a lic  code that is  trivial to
      clock check (nested node calls, for example, make it less simple).
      
      The old behavior can still be obtained using --keep-nested-calls.
      
      During  that  change,   I  realised  that  I  did   not  clock  check
      asserts. Hence, I have also added this check.
      d7905aff
  22. Jul 23, 2008
  23. Jul 22, 2008
  24. Jul 01, 2008
  25. Jun 30, 2008
  26. Jun 26, 2008
  27. Jun 18, 2008
  28. Jun 12, 2008
  29. Jun 09, 2008
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      Use type_eff_ext everywhere I was using type_eff (and rename · 00c67618
      Erwan Jahier authored
      type_eff_ext into type_eff btw). The  rationale is to be able to type
      alias           on           polymorphic          nodes           (cf
      test/should_fail/semantics/bad_call03.lus,  that now  have  a correct
      error msg).  It also makes  to code more compact (no more translation
      from one  to the  other), and more  general (type_eff_ext  being more
      general than type_eff).  User polymorphic nodes should be easy now.
      
      move all the code in parsey.mly into parserUtil.ml (ease the debug).
      00c67618
  30. Jun 06, 2008
  31. Jun 05, 2008
  32. Jun 02, 2008
  33. May 27, 2008
  34. May 26, 2008
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      * mapred -> fillred · b3051f50
      Erwan Jahier authored
      b3051f50
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      I have complety rewritten the way predef operator typing is · b09c78c5
      Erwan Jahier authored
      performed. The resulting code is both more compact, and more general.
      
      It is more  general, since that predef operators  are now represented
      by  node_exp_eff, exactly as  user nodes.   Hence, all  the functions
      that were  operating on  user nodes via  node_exp_eff (such  as, node
      aliasing) works for free on predef op!
      
      In order to be able  to perform that generalisation, it was necessary
      to  extend sligthly  the data  structure used  to represent  the node
      profile in CompiledData.node_exp_eff with information indicating if a
      variable is polymorphic or overloaded.
      
      Not that, currently, polymorphic  or overloaded variables can only be
      introduced by predef  operators. But I think it would  be easy to add
      those notions for normal user nodes after this change.
      
      New non-reg files boolred now compiles. Those involving
      - boolred
      - alias on predef.op
      b09c78c5
  35. May 21, 2008
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      Add support to be able to use iterators in node aliases. · 65b93560
      Erwan Jahier authored
      Also, node aliased to other nodes were handled poorly: I was replacing
      in the syntax tree the node by its alias. Now, I really define
      the alias node using the aliases one.
      
      For instance,
      
          node toto(x:t) returns (y:t);
          let
            ...
           tel
           node titi = toto;
           node tutu(...) returns(...);
           let
              ...
      	z = titi(a);
           tel
      
      was compiled into
      
          node toto(x:t) returns (y:t);
          let
            ...
           tel
      
           node tutu(...) returns(...);
           let
              ...
      	z = toto(a);
           tel
      
      Now, I generate
      
           node toto(x:t) returns (y:t);
           let
             ...
           tel
           node titi(i1:t) returns (o1:t);
           let
             o1 =toto(i1);
           tel
           node tutu(...) returns(...);
           let
              ...
      	z = titi(a);
           tel
      
      which is equivalent, but closer to the original program.
      6.13.0
      65b93560
Loading