Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Feb 25, 2009
  2. Feb 11, 2009
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      Various fixes for the lv4 backend: · 672af392
      Erwan Jahier authored
       - expr such as "current x,y" should be written "current (x,y)"
       - abstract   struct  or   array   types  were   handled  as   extern
         types, which  prevent the struct  and array expanser to  work them
         out. In order to fix that, I have added an Abstract_type_eff variant
         to Eff.type_ which contains the concerte type.
      672af392
  3. Feb 09, 2009
  4. Feb 06, 2009
  5. Feb 05, 2009
  6. Feb 04, 2009
  7. Feb 03, 2009
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      The structure and array expanser was buggy in presence of polymorphic · cdb52a14
      Erwan Jahier authored
      nodes (e.g., map<<+,2>>). While fixing  that, I put all the functions
      that deals with polymorphism into a new (Eponymous) dedicated module.
      
      The idea to be able to expand polymorphic node is basically the same,
      as the one for printing polymorphic  nodes: we need to wait until the
      type is instanciated (in GetEff).  That delay is implemented by using
      a stack of nodes.
      cdb52a14
  8. Jan 30, 2009
  9. Dec 12, 2008
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      Break the recursivity is the Eff.node_exp representation (which fix nested iter. pbs). · 5c722d86
      Erwan Jahier authored
      In  short, the  rationale for  this change,  is that  it is  having a
      recursive node_exp is
      - useless,
      - too complicated,
      - wrong w.r.t. nesting iterator calls
      
      In long:
      
      - It is useless because, at the  Eff level, a node cannot call itself
        via one  of its  static arg (which  was where the  recursivity came
        from).
      
      - and indeed, it  is much simpler to consider that  a static arg node
        can only be ident.long that identifies a node alias.
      
        This  means of  course, that  nested iterators  have  been unnested
        before,   inventing  alias   node  names   along  the   way...  And
        polymorphism makes thing difficult once again.
      
      - But the  *big* problem  with a recursive  node_exp is that  it make
        things very  complicated to (lic)dump nested  iterator call because
        of polymorphism!   Actually, it  even makes thing  complicated when
        the iterators were themselves not nested in the source code !
      
        Some ugly  things were done in  LicDump to unnest  those calls when
        printing node_exp.   But this uglyness  have a price:  tricky code,
        and bugs! Indeed, nested iterators calls were wong for example when
        using  the --inline-iterator  mode (but  i would  not  be surprised
        that is wrong in other cases...).
      
      Hence,  LicDump  is  simpler,  but  of course  LazyCompiler  is  more
      complicated.  But  this  is  reasonable:  a  pretty-printer  is  not
      supposed to be complicated.
      5c722d86
  10. Dec 05, 2008
  11. Nov 28, 2008
  12. Nov 26, 2008
  13. Nov 25, 2008
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      Make sure that created node ident are valid and unique. · 403368c4
      Erwan Jahier authored
      To  do  that, we  centralized  the ident  name  creation  into a  new
      dedicated module Name.
      
      + fix should_work/NONREG/param_node.lus, we contained a combinational loop.
      403368c4
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      Replace constants by their values. · 3f2aa6c4
      Erwan Jahier authored
      The rationale for this change is that this is necessary for constants
      appearing static  arg to  be replaced. One  problem is that  they are
      handled in exactly  the same way as top-level  constants, which could
      be left  un-expanded. I could make  something in order  to not expand
      those top-levelconstants, but is it worth the trouble ?
      
      To do that,  I have changed sligthly the  representation of Eff.ARRAY
      (the elements  are now  attached to the  constructor itself,  and the
      operands  is empty)  and  the one  of  array constant  (we attach  to
      Array_const_eff  a  list  instead  of  an  array,  for  the  sake  of
      homogeneity) with what is done in Eff.val_eff.
      3f2aa6c4
  14. Nov 20, 2008
  15. Oct 23, 2008
  16. Sep 15, 2008
  17. Sep 02, 2008
  18. Sep 01, 2008
  19. Aug 29, 2008
  20. Aug 28, 2008
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      untabify all files. · a0ee285c
      Erwan Jahier authored
      a0ee285c
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      Avoid the generation of polymorphic type variables when iterating on · 8d8dcbd0
      Erwan Jahier authored
      polymorphic operators.
      
      For instance, when LicDumping expression such as
      
          map<<map<<+,4>>,5>>
      
      an  alias  node was  created  for  "map<<+,4>>"  (to unnest  iterator
      calls). Fut this node is intrically overloaded (polymorphic). In this
      change, we  look at  the type this  innr call  is used to  generate a
      specialised (mono-morphic) version of the node alias.
      
      Note that we currently still generate type variable when users write
      
           node mymap = map<<+,4>>;
      8d8dcbd0
  21. Aug 26, 2008
  22. Aug 25, 2008
    • Erwan Jahier's avatar
      Unnest array iterator calls by modifying the Lic printer. · 65c62005
      Erwan Jahier authored
      The  idea  is  the  following:  each  time  a  nested  iterator  call
      (map<<map<<n,3>>,4>>) is  encountered, we  create a fresh  alias name
      (create_alias_name) ad we  add it in the node_alias_tbl.   At the end
      of the  compilation, LicDump.dump_node_alias is  called, which prints
      the definition of those node aliases.
      
      For example, the expression  "map<<map<<n,3>>,4>>" is printed like this:
      
          map<<_node_alias1, 4>>
      
      and later, the node alias is defined:
      
          node _node_alias1(x:int) returns(y:int); let y = map<<n,3>>(x); tel;
      65c62005
  23. Aug 21, 2008
  24. Aug 19, 2008
  25. Jul 23, 2008
  26. Jul 22, 2008
  27. Jul 08, 2008
Loading