- May 26, 2009
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
message if the constant is abstract ("an integer is expected whereas an int is provided" was not a great message...).
-
Erwan Jahier authored
maintaining (ugly and error-prone) hash tables. That change revealed an untriggered bug in EvalClock.check_args: it was wrong to add in subst the substitutions made of the parameters and the arguments (it is enough to unify the clocks of the pars and of the args). For instance, consider the node (in should_work/clock/clock.lus) node clock5(x : bool; y: bool when x; z: bool when y) and the call z2 = clock5(a, b when a, c when e); I was adding y/b in the subst, which was wrong. Other minor changes: - move const_to_val_eff from Eff to UnifyClock. - GetEff.translate_val_exp now returns a substitution, in order to be able to unify clock vars and propagate the resulting substitution.
-
- Mar 04, 2009
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
(versus raising an internal error...).
-
- Feb 04, 2009
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
When a node P::n1 wants to access to a node P::n2, it is ok to search for it in the boby of P.
-
- Feb 03, 2009
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
-
- Dec 12, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
In short, the rationale for this change, is that it is having a recursive node_exp is - useless, - too complicated, - wrong w.r.t. nesting iterator calls In long: - It is useless because, at the Eff level, a node cannot call itself via one of its static arg (which was where the recursivity came from). - and indeed, it is much simpler to consider that a static arg node can only be ident.long that identifies a node alias. This means of course, that nested iterators have been unnested before, inventing alias node names along the way... And polymorphism makes thing difficult once again. - But the *big* problem with a recursive node_exp is that it make things very complicated to (lic)dump nested iterator call because of polymorphism! Actually, it even makes thing complicated when the iterators were themselves not nested in the source code ! Some ugly things were done in LicDump to unnest those calls when printing node_exp. But this uglyness have a price: tricky code, and bugs! Indeed, nested iterators calls were wong for example when using the --inline-iterator mode (but i would not be surprised that is wrong in other cases...). Hence, LicDump is simpler, but of course LazyCompiler is more complicated. But this is reasonable: a pretty-printer is not supposed to be complicated.
-
- Nov 20, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
is part of the Eff.node_ney via static node parameters. The consequence was that some nodes (the ones with node as static parameters) were and printer several times (if used several times in the user program)!
-
- Sep 15, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
change the parser and accept only clock expressions after a when. A clock is now made of 2 idents: one for the clock constructor, and one for the clock variable.
-
- Aug 29, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
-
- Aug 28, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
-
Erwan Jahier authored
polymorphic operators. For instance, when LicDumping expression such as map<<map<<+,4>>,5>> an alias node was created for "map<<+,4>>" (to unnest iterator calls). Fut this node is intrically overloaded (polymorphic). In this change, we look at the type this innr call is used to generate a specialised (mono-morphic) version of the node alias. Note that we currently still generate type variable when users write node mymap = map<<+,4>>;
-
- Aug 25, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
The idea is the following: each time a nested iterator call (map<<map<<n,3>>,4>>) is encountered, we create a fresh alias name (create_alias_name) ad we add it in the node_alias_tbl. At the end of the compilation, LicDump.dump_node_alias is called, which prints the definition of those node aliases. For example, the expression "map<<map<<n,3>>,4>>" is printed like this: map<<_node_alias1, 4>> and later, the node alias is defined: node _node_alias1(x:int) returns(y:int); let y = map<<n,3>>(x); tel;
-
- Jul 22, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
-
- Jul 08, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
iterators (e.g., "Lustre::plus" instead of "Lustre::+") in order to make the life of lic3loc easier.
-
- Jun 30, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
-
- Jun 26, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
Not yet implemented (assert false): iterators, struct Add a UnifyClock module, and rename Unify into UnifyType. nb : a lot of test are now broken, because - the clock checking is now plugged ;-) - iterators, struct are not yet implemented
-
- Jun 12, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
It does not work, I have changed my mind to use a more general clocking algorithm based on unification. I commit that current state just in case I change my mind again...
-
- Jun 09, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
type_eff_ext into type_eff btw). The rationale is to be able to type alias on polymorphic nodes (cf test/should_fail/semantics/bad_call03.lus, that now have a correct error msg). It also makes to code more compact (no more translation from one to the other), and more general (type_eff_ext being more general than type_eff). User polymorphic nodes should be easy now. move all the code in parsey.mly into parserUtil.ml (ease the debug).
-
- Jun 06, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
equations is not done at all yet). Also, print the clock decorations (when clk) in the generated file.
-
- Jun 05, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
and PredefEvalClock.
-