Erwan Jahier
authored
It causes bad error messages in the case were the parametric node is undefined. e.g., the equation S=if(M[n-1]) then (entiernat<<n>>(M)-puiss<<n+1>>(2)) else entiernat<<n>>(M); raises "Error: Bad number of (static) arguments: 0 expected, and 1 provided." when entiernat is undefined It seems useless because no test is broken. The comment mention node parameters that themselves have parameters. But it is the case for test/should_work/Gyroscope2.lus, and it is still working.
Name | Last commit | Last update |
---|---|---|
.. |