work yet though (returns the wrong type).

Also add the struct printer, and fix a bug in the static argument printing.

work yet though (returns the wrong type).

Also add the struct printer, and fix a bug in the static argument printing.

performed. The resulting code is both more compact, and more general.

It is more  general, since that predef operators  are now represented
by  node_exp_eff, exactly as  user nodes.   Hence, all  the functions
that were  operating on  user nodes via  node_exp_eff (such  as, node
aliasing) works for free on predef op!

In order to be able  to perform that generalisation, it was necessary
to  extend sligthly  the data  structure used  to represent  the node
profile in CompiledData.node_exp_eff with information indicating if a
variable is polymorphic or overloaded.

Not that, currently, polymorphic  or overloaded variables can only be
introduced by predef  operators. But I think it would  be easy to add
those notions for normal user nodes after this change.

New non-reg files boolred now compiles. Those involving
- boolred
- alias on predef.op

Also, node aliased to other nodes were handled poorly: I was replacing
in the syntax tree the node by its alias. Now, I really define
the alias node using the aliases one.

For instance,

    node toto(x:t) returns (y:t);
    let
      ...
     tel
     node titi = toto;
     node tutu(...) returns(...);
     let
        ...
	z = titi(a);
     tel

was compiled into

    node toto(x:t) returns (y:t);
    let
      ...
     tel

     node tutu(...) returns(...);
     let
        ...
	z = toto(a);
     tel

Now, I generate

     node toto(x:t) returns (y:t);
     let
       ...
     tel
     node titi(i1:t) returns (o1:t);
     let
       o1 =toto(i1);
     tel
     node tutu(...) returns(...);
     let
        ...
	z = titi(a);
     tel

which is equivalent, but closer to the original program.

they were not abstract.

(support for fill, red, etc. is coming soon).

In order to add support  for iterators, I have extended the by_pos_op
(and the by_pos_op_eff) data type with a list of static arguments. In
other words, iterators are handled as a particular case of predefined
operators.

t, and a node returning such a t, the compiler was actually returning
the type definition of t (instead of the abstract type).

In  order  to fix  that,  it  was necessary  to  add  in argument  of
Lazycompiler.solve_x_idref  a  flag  (named provide_flag)  indicating
whether the  item being  compiled appears in  the provide, or  in the
body part of the package.

This fix  triggered another bug that  we also fix: indeed,  it is not
correct to return  a compile error when the  provided parameters of a
node is not equal to  its implementation. Indeed, such parameters can
be abstract type that are defined in that package.

The test "should_work/packEnvTest/packages.lus" is now ok.

	type 'a hereflagged =
	  Here of 'a
	| NotHere of Ident.long
into
	type 'a elt =
	  Local of 'a
	| Imported of Ident.long * static_arg list

i.e., i am basically doing two things:
 - fix poor naming
 - adding static arg to nodes

indeed, when compiling an equation that involves nodes defined
in another package, I need to check that the static args and the
static params match. Therefore I need to have the static params !
Therefore I add them (I will use them in the next commit).

Moreover, in SyntaxTreeCore.node_info, the static_params list was
an option type, which is a bit weird (empty lists are enough to
represent node with no static params).

in the shoud_work directory!).

For non-regression tests, do not use Lazycompiler.test function
anymore and just use  LazyCompiler.node_check instead.

put in the new file compiledDataDump.ml all the stuff
related to string convertions of CompiledData items.

and anonymous structures. I've even found some type errors in the non-reg files!

EvalNode.f -> GetEff.node,
EvalType.f -> GetEff.typ,
EvalEq.f -> GetEff.eq

EvalConst.f (val_exp -> const_eff list) should have been put there too,
but in fact EvalConst.f ougth to be splitted in two parts:
  - val_exp -> val_exp_eff (but this function already exist)
  - val_exp_eff -> const_eff list

Therefore, the signature of EvalConst.f will be changed to:
val_exp_eff -> const_eff list (and will use GetEff.val_exp)

Ditto for eval_array_index.

 eval_array_index : CompiledData.id_solver -> SyntaxTreeCore.val_exp -> int -> int

ougth to be splitted into two functions:
   - CompiledData.id_solver -> SyntaxTreeCore.val_exp_eff
   - SyntaxTreeCore.val_exp_eff -> int -> int

Ditto for eval_array_size

 eval_array_size : CompiledData.id_solver -> SyntaxTreeCore.val_exp -> int

ougth to be splitted into two functions:
   - CompiledData.id_solver -> SyntaxTreeCore.val_exp_eff
   - SyntaxTreeCore.val_exp_eff -> int

arg... evalConst.f est utilis par GettEff.typ !!!

values could not be exported, while expandPack.ml was exporting it.

This is done via the new module EvalEq.

A lot of new errors appear in the on-reg tests, which is normal as
quite a lot of the code is now used...

i.e.,
	a = operator +(1,3);
or
	a = map<<operator +>>(l);

This is to simplify the syntax tree. We migth undo this change in the
future, or perform the same thing differently.

around a lexing bug that I don't know how to fix yet.

Add Some lustre files that are automatically tested thanks to the
generic Makefile (from the Youssef compiler).

Test files are organized as follows :

 - files in directories that are under the "should_fail" directory
  do triggers errors, but it is intented

	should_fail/syntax
	should_fail/type
	should_fail/semantics

 - and files that should not trigger any error:

	should_work/