- Jun 05, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
and PredefEvalClock.
-
- May 26, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
performed. The resulting code is both more compact, and more general. It is more general, since that predef operators are now represented by node_exp_eff, exactly as user nodes. Hence, all the functions that were operating on user nodes via node_exp_eff (such as, node aliasing) works for free on predef op! In order to be able to perform that generalisation, it was necessary to extend sligthly the data structure used to represent the node profile in CompiledData.node_exp_eff with information indicating if a variable is polymorphic or overloaded. Not that, currently, polymorphic or overloaded variables can only be introduced by predef operators. But I think it would be easy to add those notions for normal user nodes after this change. New non-reg files boolred now compiles. Those involving - boolred - alias on predef.op
-
- May 21, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
Also, node aliased to other nodes were handled poorly: I was replacing in the syntax tree the node by its alias. Now, I really define the alias node using the aliases one. For instance, node toto(x:t) returns (y:t); let ... tel node titi = toto; node tutu(...) returns(...); let ... z = titi(a); tel was compiled into node toto(x:t) returns (y:t); let ... tel node tutu(...) returns(...); let ... z = toto(a); tel Now, I generate node toto(x:t) returns (y:t); let ... tel node titi(i1:t) returns (o1:t); let o1 =toto(i1); tel node tutu(...) returns(...); let ... z = titi(a); tel which is equivalent, but closer to the original program.
-
- May 20, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
(support for fill, red, etc. is coming soon). In order to add support for iterators, I have extended the by_pos_op (and the by_pos_op_eff) data type with a list of static arguments. In other words, iterators are handled as a particular case of predefined operators.
-
- May 02, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
not compile them is (well, was) the default...). also, during pretty-printing, remove the type in the constant definition (e.g., "const x = 42;" instead of "const x = 42:int;"), except if it is an abstract constant of course
-
- Mar 28, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
and anonymous structures. I've even found some type errors in the non-reg files!
-
- Mar 20, 2008
-
-
Erwan Jahier authored
operators. Predef contains the abstract syntax of those operators (taken for SyntaxTreeCore.by_pos_op), and PredefSemantics contains: - const_eval: that says how to statically evaluate constants - type_eval: that provides the type profile of predef operators - clock_eval: that provides the clock profile of predef operators The code in EvalConst that dealt with predef const evaluation is now in Predef.const_eval
-