Ditto for Misc and Compile

More precisely, issuing an "exit 2" is not enough for the
should_work proc in test/site.exp to state that the test fails.

That fix revealed a certain number of bad programs.
Some were not really wrong ; there were just not respecting the
naming convention used to automated the test (i.e., main node name =
file name).

It also releaved a real bug due to the fact that type
instanciatiation is not propagated during model instanciatiation,
where creates a loop between (Lic2soc.process_node and
Lic2soc.soc_of_node). Indeed it searches in the soc the table for an
abstract profile.

* la syntaxe est changee pour l'accepter
* la stucture IdSolver (compil "lazy") contient maintenant
  "all_srcs" qui permet d'acceder si besoin a n'importe quelle info source,
  notamment les params statiques des noeuds identifies par "Pack::name"

As far as ldbg is concerned, it only traces the toplevel node, at
call event.

Note that I needed to rename quite a lot of modules to avoid name clashes
between lus2lic.a and ltop.

I've also merged the Verbose module with the one of Lutin so that
they can be shared (there were sharing 95% already).

1) At the Lic level, there's no reason to distinguish betwenn node
calls, and predef node calls. Indeed it makes things simpler and more
homogeneous afterwards.

2) int strings are only converted when necessary (constant evaluation).

3) const are handled directly under Lic.by_pos_op instead of being under
   PREDEF_CALL, which make things easier and more logical.

nb: les tests ne passent toujours bien sur.

* Partie lus -> AST

predef.ml -> srcPredef.ml
syntaxTreeCore.ml -> astCore.ml
syntaxTree.ml     -> astV6.ml
syntaxTreeDump.mli-> astV6Dump.mli

* Partie Ast -> Ast

solveIdent.mli -> astRecognizePredef.mli
syntaxTab.mli -> astTab.mli
symbolTab.mli -> astTabSymbol.mli

* Partie  AST -> lic (static evaluation)

eff.ml  -> lic.ml
getEff.mli -> ast2lic.mli
lazyCompiler.mli -> licTab.mli
builtIn.ml -> licMetaOp.ml
predefEval*.ml -> licEval*.ml
name.mli -> licName.mli

* Partie Lic -> Lic

uniqueOutput.mli      -> l2lCheckOutputs.mli
structArrayExpand.mli -> l2lExpandArrays.mli
nodesExpand.mli       -> l2lExpandNodes.mli
doNoPoly.ml           -> l2lRmPoly.ml
doAliasTypes.ml       -> l2lAliasType.ml
doSplit.ml            -> l2lSplit.ml

the moment, I just don't generate such operator anymore (i generate the
polymorphic version Lustre::lt instead). I don't really know what is the
better.

fixing the v4 backend : print "+" instead of "Lustre::plus" (and ditto for the others).

In  short, the  rationale for  this change,  is that  it is  having a
recursive node_exp is
- useless,
- too complicated,
- wrong w.r.t. nesting iterator calls

In long:

- It is useless because, at the  Eff level, a node cannot call itself
  via one  of its  static arg (which  was where the  recursivity came
  from).

- and indeed, it  is much simpler to consider that  a static arg node
  can only be ident.long that identifies a node alias.

  This  means of  course, that  nested iterators  have  been unnested
  before,   inventing  alias   node  names   along  the   way...  And
  polymorphism makes thing difficult once again.

- But the  *big* problem  with a recursive  node_exp is that  it make
  things very  complicated to (lic)dump nested  iterator call because
  of polymorphism!   Actually, it  even makes thing  complicated when
  the iterators were themselves not nested in the source code !

  Some ugly  things were done in  LicDump to unnest  those calls when
  printing node_exp.   But this uglyness  have a price:  tricky code,
  and bugs! Indeed, nested iterators calls were wong for example when
  using  the --inline-iterator  mode (but  i would  not  be surprised
  that is wrong in other cases...).

Hence,  LicDump  is  simpler,  but  of course  LazyCompiler  is  more
complicated.  But  this  is  reasonable:  a  pretty-printer  is  not
supposed to be complicated.

by position). Rename ExpandPack into InstanciateModel.

to avoid name clashes in the lic.

SolveIdent.recognize_predef_op  that  replaces  node call  by  Predef
constructor  when   necessary,  via  a  complete   traversal  of  the
SyntaxTree (instead  of doing it  in the parser). The  rationales for
this change are that:

- it is quite tedious to do it in parser as multiple locations are involved
- I did missed some locations
- It makes the parser more focused on parsing issues
- that traversal  is a first step  do deal with  idref solving (hence
 the name of the new module that contains that function

Note that lsrc/test/should_work/fab_test/lecteur.lus was using
"plus" as a variable ident, which raised an error, which

before '..'.

(well, for the first file, the numbers were ok :-).

Also, begin to sort out a little bit the mess in the Global module.

Moreover, augment the necessary print level of most internal structure
dumping function.

package.

Better  error msg  when instanciating  a  model by  provided a  wrong
number of arguments.

performed. The resulting code is both more compact, and more general.

It is more  general, since that predef operators  are now represented
by  node_exp_eff, exactly as  user nodes.   Hence, all  the functions
that were  operating on  user nodes via  node_exp_eff (such  as, node
aliasing) works for free on predef op!

In order to be able  to perform that generalisation, it was necessary
to  extend sligthly  the data  structure used  to represent  the node
profile in CompiledData.node_exp_eff with information indicating if a
variable is polymorphic or overloaded.

Not that, currently, polymorphic  or overloaded variables can only be
introduced by predef  operators. But I think it would  be easy to add
those notions for normal user nodes after this change.

New non-reg files boolred now compiles. Those involving
- boolred
- alias on predef.op

Also, node aliased to other nodes were handled poorly: I was replacing
in the syntax tree the node by its alias. Now, I really define
the alias node using the aliases one.

For instance,

    node toto(x:t) returns (y:t);
    let
      ...
     tel
     node titi = toto;
     node tutu(...) returns(...);
     let
        ...
	z = titi(a);
     tel

was compiled into

    node toto(x:t) returns (y:t);
    let
      ...
     tel

     node tutu(...) returns(...);
     let
        ...
	z = toto(a);
     tel

Now, I generate

     node toto(x:t) returns (y:t);
     let
       ...
     tel
     node titi(i1:t) returns (o1:t);
     let
       o1 =toto(i1);
     tel
     node tutu(...) returns(...);
     let
        ...
	z = titi(a);
     tel

which is equivalent, but closer to the original program.

(support for fill, red, etc. is coming soon).

In order to add support  for iterators, I have extended the by_pos_op
(and the by_pos_op_eff) data type with a list of static arguments. In
other words, iterators are handled as a particular case of predefined
operators.

command-line) to compile a node in a package that does not exist.

t, and a node returning such a t, the compiler was actually returning
the type definition of t (instead of the abstract type).

In  order  to fix  that,  it  was necessary  to  add  in argument  of
Lazycompiler.solve_x_idref  a  flag  (named provide_flag)  indicating
whether the  item being  compiled appears in  the provide, or  in the
body part of the package.

This fix  triggered another bug that  we also fix: indeed,  it is not
correct to return  a compile error when the  provided parameters of a
node is not equal to  its implementation. Indeed, such parameters can
be abstract type that are defined in that package.

The test "should_work/packEnvTest/packages.lus" is now ok.

	type 'a hereflagged =
	  Here of 'a
	| NotHere of Ident.long
into
	type 'a elt =
	  Local of 'a
	| Imported of Ident.long * static_arg list

i.e., i am basically doing two things:
 - fix poor naming
 - adding static arg to nodes

indeed, when compiling an equation that involves nodes defined
in another package, I need to check that the static args and the
static params match. Therefore I need to have the static params !
Therefore I add them (I will use them in the next commit).

Moreover, in SyntaxTreeCore.node_info, the static_params list was
an option type, which is a bit weird (empty lists are enough to
represent node with no static params).

not compile them is (well, was) the default...).

also, during pretty-printing, remove the type in the constant definition
(e.g., "const x = 42;" instead of "const x = 42:int;"), except if it is an abstract
constant of course

For non-regression tests, do not use Lazycompiler.test function
anymore and just use  LazyCompiler.node_check instead.

put in the new file compiledDataDump.ml all the stuff
related to string convertions of CompiledData items.

To do that, we :

(1) totally remove  (in the  ocaml code) the  use of "oper",  and use
"node" instead.  Indeed, a node  is a memoryfull operator, as opposed
to function that are memoryless operators.  However, lus2lic does not
really care about memoryless  and memoryfull information. Therefore I
prefer  to use  node everywhere,  and to  flag node_info  to indicate
whether it has memories or not.

(2) change the syntaxTreeCore type to make it more general. Indeed,
    the distinction between functions and nodes was

    - redundant:  extern nodes  and (extern)  functions  were handled
    differently (NodeExtern versus ExtNode (was named FUNC before)).

    - and  incomplete:   it  was  not  possible   to  provide  static
      parameters to function, nor to define functions with body, etc.

Now a  function is  just a memoryless  node. The check  that function
indeed use no memory will be done later.

(3) also,  change  the  parser   so  that  functions  with  body  are
    accepted.

(4) in order  to do it step by  step, I add the  "extern" keyword" so
    that extern nodes and functions are more easy to parse. I will
    remove it later.

	 oper -> node
	 func -> extern node
	 node -> (user) node

	 CALL_BY_NAME -> STRUCT_n
	 STRUCT_EXP_n -> STRUCT_anonymous_n
	 flaged -> flagged

src/syntaxTreeCore.ml (new file)
	Split      syntaxTree.ml      into     syntaxTree.ml      and
	syntaxTreeCore.ml. The idea is that lic2loc should be able to
	use syntaxTreeCore.ml verbatim.

src/lxm.ml
src/lxm.mli
	remove pack_name from  this module, so that it  can be shared
	with  lic2loc too  (this is  mandatory  since it  is used  by
	SyntaxTreeCore)

src/compile.ml
src/compiledData.ml
src/evalConst.ml
src/evalConst.mli
src/evalType.ml
src/evalType.mli
src/expandPack.ml
src/lazyCompiler.ml
src/main.ml
src/parser.mly
src/symbolTab.ml
src/symbolTab.mli
src/syntaxTab.ml
src/syntaxTreeDump.ml
src/syntaxTreeDump.mli
src/test/Makefile
src/test/packs.lus
src/test/test.res.exp
	opening SyntaxTreeCore  module, and inline  the definition of
	Lxm.pack_name.

	Also,  begin  to  replace  oper  by node  or  predef_node  in
	identifiers, in order to get a more consistant naming scheme.

	Try to split this 400 lines (!) function.
	+ Factorize some duplicated code.

Ident.t is now an abstract data type (instead of a string).
fullid is turned into an Ident.long, and is also made abstract.

Add basic regression tests.

Add "assert false" statements everywhere it was necessary.

Add the fby operator in the syntax.