Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
L
lustre-v6
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
verimag
synchrone
lustre-v6
Commits
a6ce1fc8
Commit
a6ce1fc8
authored
5 years ago
by
erwan
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Build: use the test opam-repo for CI
parent
cd4c610a
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Pipeline
#23491
failed
5 years ago
Stage: build
Stage: test
Stage: release
Changes
2
Pipelines
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
.gitlab-ci.yml
+1
-1
1 addition, 1 deletion
.gitlab-ci.yml
test/lus2lic.sum
+13
-13
13 additions, 13 deletions
test/lus2lic.sum
with
14 additions
and
14 deletions
.gitlab-ci.yml
+
1
−
1
View file @
a6ce1fc8
...
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ stages:
...
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ stages:
build
:
build
:
stage
:
build
stage
:
build
script
:
script
:
-
opam repo add verimag-sync-repo "http://www-verimag.imag.fr/DIST-TOOLS/SYNCHRONE/opam-repository"
-
opam repo add verimag-sync-repo "http://www-verimag.imag.fr/DIST-TOOLS/SYNCHRONE/
test/
opam-repository"
-
opam update
-
opam update
-
opam install -y camlp4 ocamlfind oasis extlib
-
opam install -y camlp4 ocamlfind oasis extlib
-
opam install rdbg
-
opam install rdbg
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
test/lus2lic.sum
+
13
−
13
View file @
a6ce1fc8
==> lus2lic0.sum <==
==> lus2lic0.sum <==
Test run by jahier on
Wed
Apr
1
0
10:1
5:0
0
Test run by jahier on
Tue
Apr
3
0
09:2
5:0
1
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic0 tests ===
=== lus2lic0 tests ===
...
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ XFAIL: Test bad programs (assert): test_lus2lic_no_node should_fail/assert/lecte
...
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ XFAIL: Test bad programs (assert): test_lus2lic_no_node should_fail/assert/lecte
XFAIL: Test bad programs (assert): test_lus2lic_no_node should_fail/assert/s.lus
XFAIL: Test bad programs (assert): test_lus2lic_no_node should_fail/assert/s.lus
==> lus2lic1.sum <==
==> lus2lic1.sum <==
Test run by jahier on
Wed
Apr
1
0
10:1
5:0
1
Test run by jahier on
Tue
Apr
3
0
09:2
5:0
2
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic1 tests ===
=== lus2lic1 tests ===
...
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ PASS: sh multipar.sh
...
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ PASS: sh multipar.sh
PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c multipar.lus {}
PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c multipar.lus {}
==> lus2lic2.sum <==
==> lus2lic2.sum <==
Test run by jahier on
Wed
Apr
1
0
10:1
5:2
7
Test run by jahier on
Tue
Apr
3
0
09:2
5:2
5
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic2 tests ===
=== lus2lic2 tests ===
...
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ PASS: sh zzz2.sh
...
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ PASS: sh zzz2.sh
PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c zzz2.lus {}
PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c zzz2.lus {}
==> lus2lic3.sum <==
==> lus2lic3.sum <==
Test run by jahier on
Wed
Apr
1
0
10:1
5:55
Test run by jahier on
Tue
Apr
3
0
09:2
5:55
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic3 tests ===
=== lus2lic3 tests ===
...
@@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node multipar.lus {}
...
@@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node multipar.lus {}
==> lus2lic4.sum <==
==> lus2lic4.sum <==
Test run by jahier on
Wed
Apr
1
0
10:1
6:3
5
Test run by jahier on
Tue
Apr
3
0
09:2
6:3
4
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic4 tests ===
=== lus2lic4 tests ===
...
@@ -1777,13 +1777,13 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node zzz2.lus {}
...
@@ -1777,13 +1777,13 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node zzz2.lus {}
===============================
===============================
# Total number of failures: 15
# Total number of failures: 15
lus2lic0.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test0.exp completed in 1 seconds
lus2lic0.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test0.exp completed in 1 seconds
lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 2
6
seconds
lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 2
3
seconds
lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in
28
seconds
lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in
30
seconds
lus2lic3.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test3.exp completed in
40
seconds
lus2lic3.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test3.exp completed in
39
seconds
lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 1
5
seconds
lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 1
6
seconds
* Ref time:
* Ref time:
5
5.29
user
23.22
system 1:49.
89
elapsed 7
1
%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2
80904
maxresident)k
5
6.68
user
19.96
system 1:49.
30
elapsed 7
0
%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2
76932
maxresident)k
0inputs+143
264
outputs (0major+1
5390166
minor)pagefaults 0swaps
0inputs+143
192
outputs (0major+1
0996907
minor)pagefaults 0swaps
* Quick time (-j 4):
* Quick time (-j 4):
63.
7
5user 2
5
.5
5
system 1:
10.19
elapsed 12
7
%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2
80964
maxresident)k
63.
4
5user 2
1
.5
2
system 1:
09.21
elapsed 12
2
%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2
76588
maxresident)k
393
6inputs+1
41656
outputs (
1
major+1
5214675
minor)pagefaults 0swaps
189
6inputs+1
39552
outputs (
0
major+1
0753810
minor)pagefaults 0swaps
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment