Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit a1f63a4a authored by Erwan Jahier's avatar Erwan Jahier
Browse files

Run the test on montrond, not on bauges.

parent 16d79e9f
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
src/lv6version.ml
+ 3
− 3
View file @ a1f63a4a
(** Automatically generated from Makefile *)
let tool = "lus2lic"
let branch = "(no"
let commit = "540"
let sha_1 = "9e224dbfbc580103252b1672f8c2a4882e7c6fc7"
let branch = "master"
let commit = "542"
let sha_1 = "1042961407535d5fa282ca148411cc3915e7dd8a"
let str = (branch ^ "." ^ commit ^ " (" ^ sha_1 ^ ")")
let maintainer = "jahier@imag.fr"
test/Makefile
+ 1
− 1
View file @ a1f63a4a
......@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
test: ltop clean reftest lus2lic.time
TEST_MACHINE=ssh bauges
TEST_MACHINE=ssh montrond
#TEST_MACHINE=eval
# This fixes sporadic memory errors I get when running tests
OCAMLRUNPARAM=s=1M,i=32M,o=150
......
test/lus2lic.sum
+ 14
− 14
View file @ a1f63a4a
==> lus2lic0.sum <==
Test Run By jahier on Thu Oct 9 17:55:51
Test Run By jahier on Mon Dec 8 16:31:37
Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic0 tests ===
......@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ XFAIL: Test bad programs (assert): test_lus2lic_no_node should_fail/assert/lecte
XFAIL: Test bad programs (assert): test_lus2lic_no_node should_fail/assert/s.lus
==> lus2lic1.sum <==
Test Run By jahier on Thu Oct 9 17:55:49
Test Run By jahier on Mon Dec 8 16:31:43
Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic1 tests ===
......@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ PASS: gcc -o multipar.exec multipar_multipar.c multipar_multipar_loop.c
PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c multipar.lus {}
==> lus2lic2.sum <==
Test Run By jahier on Thu Oct 9 17:55:57
Test Run By jahier on Mon Dec 8 16:31:39
Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic2 tests ===
......@@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ PASS: gcc -o zzz2.exec zzz2_zzz2.c zzz2_zzz2_loop.c
PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c zzz2.lus {}
==> lus2lic3.sum <==
Test Run By jahier on Thu Oct 9 17:55:55
Test Run By jahier on Mon Dec 8 16:31:41
Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic3 tests ===
......@@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@ PASS: ./myec2c {-o multipar.c multipar.ec}
PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node multipar.lus {}
==> lus2lic4.sum <==
Test Run By jahier on Thu Oct 9 17:55:53
Test Run By jahier on Mon Dec 8 16:31:45
Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic4 tests ===
......@@ -1726,14 +1726,14 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node zzz2.lus {}
# of unexpected failures 3
===============================
# Total number of failures: 14
lus2lic0.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test0.exp completed in 0 seconds
lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 21 seconds
lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in 63 seconds
lus2lic3.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test3.exp completed in 19 seconds
lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 67 seconds
lus2lic0.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test0.exp completed in 4 seconds
lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 69 seconds
lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in 98 seconds
lus2lic3.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test3.exp completed in 60 seconds
lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 95 seconds
* Ref time:
0.03user 0.06system 2:43.55elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 3004maxresident)k
120inputs+0outputs (0major+14860minor)pagefaults 0swaps
0.04user 0.05system 4:36.62elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 3012maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+14885minor)pagefaults 0swaps
* Quick time (-j 4):
0.04user 0.06system 1:12.11elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 3004maxresident)k
120inputs+0outputs (0major+14864minor)pagefaults 0swaps
0.05user 0.03system 1:43.13elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 3012maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+14894minor)pagefaults 0swaps
test/lus2lic.time
+ 9
− 9
View file @ a1f63a4a
lus2lic0.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test0.exp completed in 0 seconds
lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 21 seconds
lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in 63 seconds
lus2lic3.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test3.exp completed in 19 seconds
lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 67 seconds
lus2lic0.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test0.exp completed in 4 seconds
lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 69 seconds
lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in 98 seconds
lus2lic3.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test3.exp completed in 60 seconds
lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 95 seconds
* Ref time:
0.03user 0.06system 2:43.55elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 3004maxresident)k
120inputs+0outputs (0major+14860minor)pagefaults 0swaps
0.04user 0.05system 4:36.62elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 3012maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+14885minor)pagefaults 0swaps
* Quick time (-j 4):
0.04user 0.06system 1:12.11elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 3004maxresident)k
120inputs+0outputs (0major+14864minor)pagefaults 0swaps
0.05user 0.03system 1:43.13elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 3012maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+14894minor)pagefaults 0swaps
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment