Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 1fefdbaf authored by Erwan Jahier's avatar Erwan Jahier
Browse files

socExec: Unintialised var should not raise an internal error (is returning nil fine?).

parent f60f7f06
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
(* Time-stamp: <modified the 13/08/2014 (at 09:32) by Erwan Jahier> *)
(* Time-stamp: <modified the 22/08/2014 (at 15:08) by Erwan Jahier> *)
let dbg = (Verbose.get_flag "exec")
......@@ -239,8 +239,8 @@ fun id ctx ->
| B true -> "true"
| B false -> "false"
| U ->
print_string (id ^ " undefined\n"); flush stdout;
assert false
(* print_string (id ^ " undefined\n"); flush stdout; *)
raise Not_found
| o ->
print_string ("get_enum '" ^ (val_to_string string_of_float o) ^"' failed\n"); flush stdout;
assert false (* should not fail *)
......
Test Run By jahier on Fri Aug 22 14:36:14
Test Run By jahier on Fri Aug 22 15:21:27
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic0 tests ===
......@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ XFAIL: Test bad programs (assert): test_lus2lic_no_node should_fail/assert/eq1.l
# of expected passes 1
# of expected failures 50
Test Run By jahier on Fri Aug 22 14:36:20
Test Run By jahier on Fri Aug 22 15:21:35
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic1 tests ===
......@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ PASS: ./lus2lic {-2c Int.lus -n Int}
# of expected passes 325
# of unexpected failures 21
Test Run By jahier on Fri Aug 22 14:37:16
Test Run By jahier on Fri Aug 22 15:23:04
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic2 tests ===
......@@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ PASS: gcc zzz_zzz.c zzz_zzz_loop.c
PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c zzz.lus
PASS: ./lus2lic {-2c PCOND1.lus -n PCOND1}
PASS: gcc PCOND1_PCOND1.c PCOND1_PCOND1_loop.c
FAIL: Try to compare lus2lic -exec and -2c: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c PCOND1.lus
PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c PCOND1.lus
FAIL: Generate c code : ./lus2lic {-2c PCOND.lus -n PCOND}
PASS: ./lus2lic {-2c SWITCH.lus -n SWITCH}
PASS: gcc SWITCH_SWITCH.c SWITCH_SWITCH_loop.c
......@@ -751,9 +751,9 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c X.lus
=== lus2lic2 Summary ===
# of expected passes 303
# of unexpected failures 10
Test Run By jahier on Fri Aug 22 14:38:53
# of expected passes 304
# of unexpected failures 9
Test Run By jahier on Fri Aug 22 15:24:56
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic3 tests ===
......@@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ PASS: ./myec2c {-o Int.c Int.ec}
# of expected passes 475
# of unexpected failures 15
Test Run By jahier on Fri Aug 22 14:39:54
Test Run By jahier on Fri Aug 22 15:26:31
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic4 tests ===
......@@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node zzz.lus
PASS: ./lus2lic {-o PCOND1.lic PCOND1.lus}
PASS: ./lus2lic {-ec -o PCOND1.ec PCOND1.lus}
PASS: ./myec2c {-o PCOND1.c PCOND1.ec}
FAIL: Try to compare lus2lic -exec and ecexe: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node PCOND1.lus
PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node PCOND1.lus
FAIL: without any option: ./lus2lic {-o PCOND.lic PCOND.lus}
PASS: ./lus2lic {-o SWITCH.lic SWITCH.lus}
PASS: ./lus2lic {-ec -o SWITCH.ec SWITCH.lus}
......@@ -1702,14 +1702,14 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node X.lus
=== lus2lic4 Summary ===
# of expected passes 421
# of unexpected failures 10
lus2lic0.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test0.exp completed in 5 seconds
lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 56 seconds
lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in 95 seconds
lus2lic3.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test3.exp completed in 60 seconds
lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 116 seconds
# of expected passes 422
# of unexpected failures 9
lus2lic0.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test0.exp completed in 7 seconds
lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 87 seconds
lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in 111 seconds
lus2lic3.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test3.exp completed in 94 seconds
lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 156 seconds
* Ref time:
0.12user 0.06system 5:36.96elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2464maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+12518minor)pagefaults 0swaps
0.11user 0.07system 7:41.15elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2460maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+12507minor)pagefaults 0swaps
* Quick time (-j 4):
lus2lic0.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test0.exp completed in 5 seconds
lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 56 seconds
lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in 95 seconds
lus2lic3.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test3.exp completed in 60 seconds
lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 116 seconds
lus2lic0.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test0.exp completed in 7 seconds
lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 87 seconds
lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in 111 seconds
lus2lic3.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test3.exp completed in 94 seconds
lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 156 seconds
* Ref time:
0.12user 0.06system 5:36.96elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2464maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+12518minor)pagefaults 0swaps
0.11user 0.07system 7:41.15elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2460maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+12507minor)pagefaults 0swaps
* Quick time (-j 4):
......@@ -8,8 +8,10 @@ var
hB_on_h0: bool when h0;
hC_on_h0: bool when h0;
hD_on_hC_on_h0: bool when hC_on_h0;
hX_init:bool;
let
hX = current(hX_on_h0);
hX_init = h0 or (false fby h0);
hX = if hX_init then current(hX_on_h0) else false;
hA_on_h0 = hA when h0;
hB_on_h0 = hB when h0;
hC_on_h0 = hC when h0;
......
......@@ -12,15 +12,15 @@
3. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/test_node_expand.lus
4. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/modes3x2_v2.lus
5. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/filter.lus
6. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/PCOND1.lus
7. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/multipar.lus
8. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/activation2.lus
9. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/bob.lus
10. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/test_condact.lus
11. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/activation1.lus
12. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/Gyroscope.lus
13. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/cond01.lus
14. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/speedcontrol.lus
6. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/multipar.lus
7. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/activation2.lus
8. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/bob.lus
9. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/test_condact.lus
10. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/activation1.lus
11. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/Gyroscope.lus
12. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/cond01.lus
13. ../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node should_work/speedcontrol.lus
** TODO Extern and ec
......@@ -41,13 +41,8 @@ grep "FAIL:" lus2lic*.log | grep "exec" | grep "\-2c" | sed s/'FAIL: Try to comp
2. ../utils/compare_exec_and_2c should_work/test_node_expand.lus 2000
-> idem
3. ../utils/compare_exec_and_2c should_work/PCOND1.lus 2000
-> File "../obj-linux/socExecValue.ml", line 243, characters 6-12: Assertion failed
4. ../utils/compare_exec_and_2c should_work/multipar.lus 2000
-> pb 32bits
5. ../utils/compare_exec_and_2c should_work/array_concat.lus 2000
-> le a.out fait un segmentation fault
3. ../utils/compare_exec_and_2c should_work/multipar.lus 2000
-> idem
** TODO lic2c : le jour ou on genere du code C, y'a peut-etre des trucs a recuperer
- State "TODO" from "" [2012-12-10 Mon 14:32]
......
......@@ -55,9 +55,7 @@ then
echo "Comparison of lus2lic -2c and lus2lic -exec with lurette on $lustre_file: ok"
echo "lurettetop ok"
else
touch a.out-via-sockets-stderr.log
cp a.out-via-sockets-stderr.log $node-out-via-sockets-stderr.log
echo "error"
echo "error"
exit 2
fi
exit 0
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment