Paper: Review 1: Paper fixes
For @jwbuurlage's review comments regarding paper
-
I think the summary could benefit from giving some simple examples, in simple words, of 3D image measurement tasks that the software can perform. -
State of the field: Yes, but the section is short, and would benefit from one or two sentences about each software package and what the functionality overlap is between them and spam. -
Reread: My main critique is that the language is too colloquial in a number of places. -
There are some inconsistencies with font usage: some software packages are written using a monospace font, and some are not. I would indeed write NumPy over numpy, and some official spellings of software packages are all lowercase which complicates matters. However, why are sphinx and unittest monospace, but tifffile and meshio are not? I would double check all official spellings of packages, for example it is Git not git. -
Some of the links are not permalinks, and this is even sometimes explicitely marked as such ('currently available at'). -
Add muDIC to other software available and (freckles?)