Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 91256dc2 authored by Yao Qi's avatar Yao Qi
Browse files

Show new created display

When I run refactored unavailable.exp, I find
command display behaves a little different on live inferior and on
examining traceframes.  In live inferior, when command "display argc"
is typed, the value of "argc" is shown.

(gdb) display argc
1: argc = 1 '\001'

however, on tfile target, when command "display argc" is typed, the
value of "argc" is not shown.

(gdb) tfind
Found trace frame 0, tracepoint 1
    at ../../../../git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/unavailable.cc:198
198       i =  (int) argc + argi + argf + argd + argstruct.memberi + argarray[1];
(gdb) display argc

I also notice that on "core" target, the value of "argc" isn't shown
either.  This difference is caused by the code below in printcmd.c:display_command,

      if (from_tty && target_has_execution)
        do_one_display (new);

Looks the value of each display is shown if the target has execution.
Source code archaeology doesn't tell much about this requirement.
However, if we type command "display" then on "core" or "tfile"
target, the value of "argc" is still displayed,

for "core" target,
(gdb) display argc
(gdb) display
1: argc = 1 '\001'

for "tfile" target,
(gdb) display argc
(gdb) display
1: argc = <unavailable>

I feel that it is not necessary to have such "target has execution"
requirement to show the value of new created display.  Auto-display is
a feature to show the value of expression frequently, has nothing to
do with whether target has execution or not.  On the other hand, GDB
has the requirement for new created display, but command "display" can
still show them, this is an inconsistency, which should be fixed.

This patch is to remove the checking to target_has_execution from the
condition.

gdb:

2014-05-05  Yao Qi  <yao@codesourcery.com>

	* printcmd.c (display_command): Remove the check to
	target_has_execution.
parent b5262cd0
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment