Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 39d5d8dc authored by Sylvain Ferraris's avatar Sylvain Ferraris
Browse files

update example gravelines page doc git

parent 5fdb128a
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline #76078 passed
Stage: build
    Stage: deploy
      Expand all Hide whitespace changes
      Inline Side-by-side
      doc/_build/doctrees/environment.pickle
      + 0
      − 0
      View file @ 39d5d8dc
      No preview for this file type
      doc/_build/html/objects.inv
      + 0
      − 0
      View file @ 39d5d8dc
      No preview for this file type
      doc/_build/html/searchindex.js
      + 1
      − 1
      View file @ 39d5d8dc
      This diff is collapsed.
      doc/documentation_MEPELSsystem/systemDOC/gravelines.rst
      + 9
      − 9
      View file @ 39d5d8dc
      ......@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Choose the beach of Gravelines:
      The figure below shows a map of the location of Gravelines after reading the raw data in the ".grd" file.
      .. image:: ./../../images/gravelines/bathy_raw_gravelines.png
      .. image:: ./../images/gravelines/bathy_raw_gravelines.png
      :width: 600
      (Visualization of the raw bathymetry read from the ".grd" file. The defined study area is represented by the red rectangle).
      ......@@ -61,12 +61,12 @@ When arriving at the bathymetric inversion step, the script shows two figures.
      The first figure below represents the 2D bathymetry of the script output with negative depths and the second figure is the 3D representation of the first figure.
      .. image:: ./../../images/gravelines/local_coordinate_systeme.png
      .. image:: ./../images/gravelines/local_coordinate_systeme.png
      :width: 600
      (Visualization of the 2D bathymetry at the end of the preprocessing script and before inversion).
      .. image:: ./../../images/gravelines/bathy3D_local_coord.png
      .. image:: ./../images/gravelines/bathy3D_local_coord.png
      :width: 600
      (Visualization of the 3D bathymetry at the end of the preprocessing script and before inversion).
      ......@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ You can follow the example by changing the choice of the beach, choose **Graveli
      Hereafter, the figures obtained by using the bathymetric analysis script for the bathymetry of Gravelines.
      .. image:: ./../../images/gravelines/cross_shore_analysis.png
      .. image:: ./../images/gravelines/cross_shore_analyse.png
      :width: 600
      (Visualization of the cross-shore profile of Gravelines beach with the mean profile (black line), a fit with the Dean profile (citet{deanEquilibriumBeachProfiles1991**) (green line), the long-shore profiles (grey line) and a reduced number of markers to define the morphodynamically active zone between the DOC value (blue line) and the HTL value (red line) defined from the hydrographic zero standard.
      ......@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ The position of the hydrographic zero (grey dotted line) is calculated according
      The figure above shows an analysis of the croos-shore profile.
      With the introduced parameters, the active morphodynamic zone is present between about -3 meters and +3 meters from bathymetry datum.
      .. image:: ./../../images/gravelines/type_beaches_evolv.png
      .. image:: ./../images/gravelines/type_beaches_evolv.png
      :width: 600
      (Model allowing the definition of the type of breaker waves as a function of the water height at the breaker point H_b and a similarity parameter in agreement with Bosboom & al. (2021).
      ......@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ With the introduced parameters, the active morphodynamic zone is present between
      The figure below shows that the Gravelines beach does not have a bar in its active morphodynamic zone.
      The beach has a predominantly dissipative character.
      .. image:: ./../../images/gravelines/breaker_type_wave.png
      .. image:: ./../images/gravelines/breaker_type_wave.png
      :width: 600
      (Evolution of the beach type according to the model proposed by Masselink (1993) for two types of conditions: Stormy and average).
      ......@@ -141,13 +141,13 @@ The following figures illustrate the remodeling of the bathymetry to obtain a di
      The figure below shows a comparison between the central profile of the original bathymetry and the average profile on the bathymetry adjusted by a Dean profile.
      .. image:: ./../../images/gravelines/gravelinesCrossfit.png
      .. image:: ./../images/gravelines/gravelinesCrossfit.png
      :width: 600
      (Comparison of the average cross-shore profile of the artificially created bathymetry (red line) without bars and the central cross-shore profile of the initial bathymetry (black line).
      .. image:: ./../../images/gravelines/graveline3D_fit.png
      .. image:: ./../images/gravelines/graveline3D_fit.png
      :width: 600
      (3D bathymetry obtained after applying a Dean profile (Dean, 1991) on all cross-shore profiles).
      ......@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ The figure above shows the 3D remodeled bathymetry after the application of the
      The figure below shows the 2D bathymetry after application of the Dean profile and without additional filtering.
      .. image:: ./../../images/gravelines/gravelines2Dfit.png
      .. image:: ./../images/gravelines/gravelines2Dfit.png
      :width: 600
      (2D visualization of the remodeled bathymetry without the presence of bar and without additional filtering).
      0% or .
      You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
      Finish editing this message first!
      Please register or to comment