Commit c6d6814a authored by erwan's avatar erwan
Browse files

Fix: a bug in -esa, wrt struct. The type of some resulting expr was wrong.

parent 230ca8fa
Pipeline #62001 failed with stages
in 1 minute and 25 seconds
This diff is collapsed.
==> lus2lic0.sum <==
Test run by jahier on Thu Jul 16 16:02:36
Test run by jahier on Thu Mar 11 17:05:43
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic0 tests ===
......@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ XFAIL: Test bad programs (assert): test_lus2lic_no_node should_fail/assert/lecte
XFAIL: Test bad programs (assert): test_lus2lic_no_node should_fail/assert/s.lus
==> lus2lic1.sum <==
Test run by jahier on Thu Jul 16 16:02:36
Test run by jahier on Thu Mar 11 17:05:43
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic1 tests ===
......@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ PASS: ./lus2lic {-2c multipar.lus -n multipar}
PASS: sh multipar.sh
==> lus2lic2.sum <==
Test run by jahier on Thu Jul 16 16:02:59
Test run by jahier on Thu Mar 11 17:06:11
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic2 tests ===
......@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ PASS: sh zzz2.sh
PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c zzz2.lus {}
==> lus2lic3.sum <==
Test run by jahier on Thu Jul 16 16:03:31
Test run by jahier on Thu Mar 11 17:06:47
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic3 tests ===
......@@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node multipar.lus {}
==> lus2lic4.sum <==
Test run by jahier on Thu Jul 16 16:04:14
Test run by jahier on Thu Mar 11 17:07:30
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== lus2lic4 tests ===
......@@ -1759,7 +1759,7 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node zzz2.lus {}
# of expected failures 54
==> lus2lic1.sum <==
PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c multipar.lus 38449 {}
PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c multipar.lus 36527 {}
=== lus2lic1 Summary ===
......@@ -1788,13 +1788,13 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c multipar.lus 38449
===============================
# Total number of failures: 10
lus2lic0.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test0.exp completed in 0 seconds
lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 23 seconds
lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in 32 seconds
lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 27 seconds
lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in 36 seconds
lus2lic3.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test3.exp completed in 43 seconds
lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 21 seconds
lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 25 seconds
* Ref time:
70.94user 15.61system 1:59.12elapsed 72%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 42400maxresident)k
24inputs+151584outputs (0major+8407741minor)pagefaults 0swaps
80.22user 17.98system 2:12.40elapsed 74%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 42380maxresident)k
0inputs+151696outputs (0major+8412242minor)pagefaults 0swaps
* Quick time (-j 4):
101.95user 20.24system 1:42.06elapsed 119%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 42568maxresident)k
14576inputs+147936outputs (15major+8232208minor)pagefaults 0swaps
96.17user 19.55system 1:26.54elapsed 133%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 42368maxresident)k
6672inputs+149632outputs (12major+8317848minor)pagefaults 0swaps
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment