Fix: a bug in -esa, wrt struct. The type of some resulting expr was wrong.

test/lus2lic.sum

 ==> lus2lic0.sum <==
-Test run by jahier on Thu Jul 16 16:02:36 
+Test run by jahier on Thu Mar 11 17:05:43 
 Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
 
 		=== lus2lic0 tests ===
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ XFAIL: Test bad programs (assert): test_lus2lic_no_node should_fail/assert/lecte
 XFAIL: Test bad programs (assert): test_lus2lic_no_node should_fail/assert/s.lus
 
 ==> lus2lic1.sum <==
-Test run by jahier on Thu Jul 16 16:02:36 
+Test run by jahier on Thu Mar 11 17:05:43 
 Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
 
 		=== lus2lic1 tests ===
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ PASS: ./lus2lic  {-2c multipar.lus -n multipar}
 PASS: sh multipar.sh 
 
 ==> lus2lic2.sum <==
-Test run by jahier on Thu Jul 16 16:02:59 
+Test run by jahier on Thu Mar 11 17:06:11 
 Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
 
 		=== lus2lic2 tests ===
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ PASS: sh zzz2.sh
 PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c zzz2.lus  {}
 
 ==> lus2lic3.sum <==
-Test run by jahier on Thu Jul 16 16:03:31 
+Test run by jahier on Thu Mar 11 17:06:47 
 Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
 
 		=== lus2lic3 tests ===
@@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node multipar.lus {}
 
 
 ==> lus2lic4.sum <==
-Test run by jahier on Thu Jul 16 16:04:14 
+Test run by jahier on Thu Mar 11 17:07:30 
 Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
 
 		=== lus2lic4 tests ===
@@ -1759,7 +1759,7 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/test_lus2lic_no_node zzz2.lus {}
 # of expected failures		54
 
 ==> lus2lic1.sum <==
-PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c multipar.lus 38449 {}
+PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c multipar.lus 36527 {}
 
 		=== lus2lic1 Summary ===
 
@@ -1788,13 +1788,13 @@ PASS: /home/jahier/lus2lic/test/../utils/compare_exec_and_2c multipar.lus 38449
 ===============================
 # Total number of failures: 10
 lus2lic0.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test0.exp completed in 0 seconds
-lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 23 seconds
-lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in 32 seconds
+lus2lic1.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test1.exp completed in 27 seconds
+lus2lic2.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test2.exp completed in 36 seconds
 lus2lic3.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test3.exp completed in 43 seconds
-lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 21 seconds
+lus2lic4.log:testcase ./lus2lic.tests/test4.exp completed in 25 seconds
 * Ref time: 
-70.94user 15.61system 1:59.12elapsed 72%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 42400maxresident)k
-24inputs+151584outputs (0major+8407741minor)pagefaults 0swaps
+80.22user 17.98system 2:12.40elapsed 74%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 42380maxresident)k
+0inputs+151696outputs (0major+8412242minor)pagefaults 0swaps
 * Quick time (-j 4):
-101.95user 20.24system 1:42.06elapsed 119%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 42568maxresident)k
-14576inputs+147936outputs (15major+8232208minor)pagefaults 0swaps
+96.17user 19.55system 1:26.54elapsed 133%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 42368maxresident)k
+6672inputs+149632outputs (12major+8317848minor)pagefaults 0swaps