update kvx

kvx/Asmblockdeps.v

@@ -398,8 +398,8 @@ Definition control_eval (o: control_op) (l: list value) :=
     end
   | Ocbu bt l, [Val v; Val vpc] =>
     match cmpu_for_btest bt with
-    | (Some c, Int) => eval_branch_deps fn l vpc (Val_cmpu_bool c v (Vint (Int.repr 0)))
-    | (Some c, Long) => eval_branch_deps fn l vpc (Val_cmplu_bool c v (Vlong (Int64.repr 0)))
+    | (Some c, Int) => eval_branch_deps fn l vpc (Val.mxcmpu_bool c v (Vint (Int.repr 0)))
+    | (Some c, Long) => eval_branch_deps fn l vpc (Val.mxcmplu_bool c v (Vlong (Int64.repr 0)))
     | (None, _) => None
     end
   | Odiv, [Val v1; Val v2] => 
@@ -1232,12 +1232,12 @@ Proof.
     (* Pcbu *)
     + rewrite (H0 PC). Simpl. rewrite (H0 r). destruct (cmpu_for_btest _); simpl; auto. destruct o; simpl; auto.
       unfold par_eval_branch. unfold eval_branch_deps. unfold incrPC. Simpl. destruct i.
-      ++ destruct (Val_cmpu_bool _ _ _); simpl; auto. destruct b.
+      ++ destruct (Val.mxcmpu_bool _ _ _); simpl; auto. destruct b.
          +++ unfold par_goto_label. unfold goto_label_deps. destruct (label_pos _ _ _); simpl; auto. Simpl.
              destruct (Val.offset_ptr _ _); simpl; auto. eexists; split; try split; Simpl.
              intros rr; destruct rr; Simpl.
          +++ repeat (econstructor; eauto). intros rr; destruct rr; Simpl.
-      ++ destruct (Val_cmplu_bool _ _ _); simpl; auto. destruct b.
+      ++ destruct (Val.mxcmplu_bool _ _ _); simpl; auto. destruct b.
          +++ unfold par_goto_label. unfold goto_label_deps. destruct (label_pos _ _ _); simpl; auto. Simpl.
              destruct (Val.offset_ptr _ _); simpl; auto. eexists; split; try split; Simpl.
              intros rr; destruct rr; Simpl.

kvx/Asmblockgenproof0.v

@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ Require Import Asmblock.
 Require Import Asmblockgen.
 Require Import Conventions1.
 Require Import Axioms.
-Require Import Machblockgenproof. (* FIXME: only use to import [is_tail_app] and [is_tail_app_inv] *)
 Require Import Asmblockprops.
 
 Module MB:=Machblock.

kvx/Asmblockgenproof1.v

@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ Lemma transl_compu_correct:
   exists rs',
      exec_straight ge (transl_comp cmp Unsigned r1 r2 lbl k) rs m (Pcb BTwnez RTMP lbl ::g k) rs' m
   /\ (forall r : preg, r <> PC -> r <> RTMP -> rs' r = rs r)  
-  /\ (Val_cmpu_bool cmp rs#r1 rs#r2 = Some b ->
+  /\ (Val.mxcmpu_bool cmp rs#r1 rs#r2 = Some b ->
        exec_control ge fn (Some (PCtlFlow ((Pcb BTwnez RTMP lbl)))) (nextblock tbb rs') m
         = eval_branch fn lbl (nextblock tbb rs') m (Some b))
   .
@@ -272,8 +272,8 @@ Proof.
       assert ((nextblock tbb rs') # RTMP = (compare_int (itest_for_cmp cmp Unsigned) rs # r1 rs # r2)).
       { rewrite Heqrs'. auto. }
       rewrite H0. rewrite <- H.
-      remember (Val_cmpu_bool cmp rs#r1 rs#r2) as cmpubool.
-      destruct cmp; simpl; unfold Val_cmpu;
+      remember (Val.mxcmpu_bool cmp rs#r1 rs#r2) as cmpubool.
+      destruct cmp; simpl; unfold Val.mxcmpu;
         rewrite <- Heqcmpubool; destruct cmpubool; simpl; auto;
       destruct b0; simpl; auto.
     }
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ Lemma transl_compui_correct:
   exists rs',
      exec_straight ge (transl_compi cmp Unsigned r1 n lbl k) rs m (Pcb BTwnez RTMP lbl ::g k) rs' m
   /\ (forall r : preg, r <> PC -> r <> RTMP -> rs' r = rs r)  
-  /\ (Val_cmpu_bool cmp rs#r1 (Vint n) = Some b ->
+  /\ (Val.mxcmpu_bool cmp rs#r1 (Vint n) = Some b ->
        exec_control ge fn (Some (PCtlFlow ((Pcb BTwnez RTMP lbl)))) (nextblock tbb rs') m
         = eval_branch fn lbl (nextblock tbb rs') m (Some b))
   .
@@ -301,8 +301,8 @@ Proof.
       assert ((nextblock tbb rs') # RTMP = (compare_int (itest_for_cmp cmp Unsigned) rs # r1 (Vint n))).
       { rewrite Heqrs'. auto. }
       rewrite H0. rewrite <- H.
-      remember (Val_cmpu_bool cmp rs#r1 (Vint n)) as cmpubool.
-      destruct cmp; simpl; unfold Val_cmpu;
+      remember (Val.mxcmpu_bool cmp rs#r1 (Vint n)) as cmpubool.
+      destruct cmp; simpl; unfold Val.mxcmpu;
         rewrite <- Heqcmpubool; destruct cmpubool; simpl; auto;
       destruct b0; simpl; auto.
     }
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ Lemma transl_complu_correct:
   exists rs',
      exec_straight ge (transl_compl cmp Unsigned r1 r2 lbl k) rs m (Pcb BTwnez RTMP lbl ::g k) rs' m
   /\ (forall r : preg, r <> PC -> r <> RTMP -> rs' r = rs r)  
-  /\ ( Val_cmplu_bool cmp rs#r1 rs#r2 = Some b ->
+  /\ ( Val.mxcmplu_bool cmp rs#r1 rs#r2 = Some b ->
        exec_control ge fn (Some (PCtlFlow (Pcb BTwnez RTMP lbl))) (nextblock tbb rs') m
         = eval_branch fn lbl (nextblock tbb rs') m (Some b))
   .
@@ -672,9 +672,9 @@ Proof.
       assert ((nextblock tbb rs') # RTMP = (compare_long (itest_for_cmp cmp Unsigned) rs # r1 rs # r2)).
       { rewrite Heqrs'. auto. }
       rewrite H0. rewrite <- H.
-      remember (Val_cmplu_bool cmp rs#r1 rs#r2) as cmpbool.
+      remember (Val.mxcmplu_bool cmp rs#r1 rs#r2) as cmpbool.
       destruct cmp; simpl;
-      unfold compare_long, Val_cmplu; rewrite <- Heqcmpbool; destruct cmpbool; simpl; auto;
+      unfold compare_long, Val.mxcmplu; rewrite <- Heqcmpbool; destruct cmpbool; simpl; auto;
       destruct b0; simpl; auto.
     }
     rewrite H0. simpl; auto.
@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ Lemma transl_compilu_correct:
   exists rs',
      exec_straight ge (transl_compil cmp Unsigned r1 n lbl k) rs m (Pcb BTwnez RTMP lbl ::g k) rs' m
   /\ (forall r : preg, r <> PC -> r <> RTMP -> rs' r = rs r)  
-  /\ ( Val_cmplu_bool cmp rs#r1 (Vlong n) = Some b ->
+  /\ ( Val.mxcmplu_bool cmp rs#r1 (Vlong n) = Some b ->
        exec_control ge fn (Some (PCtlFlow (Pcb BTwnez RTMP lbl))) (nextblock tbb rs') m
         = eval_branch fn lbl (nextblock tbb rs') m (Some b))
   .
@@ -701,9 +701,9 @@ Proof.
       assert ((nextblock tbb rs') # RTMP = (compare_long (itest_for_cmp cmp Unsigned) rs # r1 (Vlong n))).
       { rewrite Heqrs'. auto. }
       rewrite H0. rewrite <- H.
-      remember (Val_cmplu_bool cmp rs#r1 (Vlong n)) as cmpbool.
+      remember (Val.mxcmplu_bool cmp rs#r1 (Vlong n)) as cmpbool.
       destruct cmp; simpl;
-      unfold compare_long, Val_cmplu; rewrite <- Heqcmpbool; destruct cmpbool; simpl; auto;
+      unfold compare_long, Val.mxcmplu; rewrite <- Heqcmpbool; destruct cmpbool; simpl; auto;
       destruct b0; simpl; auto.
     }
     rewrite H0. simpl; auto.
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ Lemma transl_opt_compuimm_correct:
   exists rs', exists insn,
      exec_straight_opt (transl_opt_compuimm n cmp r1 lbl k) rs m ((PControl insn) ::g k) rs' m
   /\ (forall r : preg, r <> PC -> r <> RTMP -> rs' r = rs r)  
-  /\ ( Val_cmpu_bool cmp rs#r1 (Vint n) = Some b ->
+  /\ ( Val.mxcmpu_bool cmp rs#r1 (Vint n) = Some b ->
        exec_control ge fn (Some insn) (nextblock tbb rs') m = eval_branch fn lbl (nextblock tbb rs') m (Some b))
   .
 Proof.
@@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ Lemma transl_opt_compluimm_correct:
   exists rs', exists insn,
      exec_straight_opt (transl_opt_compluimm n cmp r1 lbl k) rs m ((PControl insn) ::g k) rs' m
   /\ (forall r : preg, r <> PC -> r <> RTMP -> rs' r = rs r)
-  /\ ( Val_cmplu_bool cmp rs#r1 (Vlong n) = Some b ->
+  /\ ( Val.mxcmplu_bool cmp rs#r1 (Vlong n) = Some b ->
        exec_control ge fn (Some insn) (nextblock tbb rs') m = eval_branch fn lbl (nextblock tbb rs') m (Some b))
   .
 Proof.
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ Proof.
     destruct cmp; discriminate.
 Qed.
 
-Local Hint Resolve Val_cmpu_bool_correct Val_cmplu_bool_correct: core.
+Local Hint Resolve Val.mxcmpu_bool_correct Val.mxcmplu_bool_correct: core.
 
 Lemma transl_cbranch_correct_1:
   forall cond args lbl k c m ms b sp rs m' tbb,
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ Proof.
     split.
     * constructor. eexact A'.
     * split; auto.
-      { apply C'; auto. eapply Val_cmplu_bool_correct; eauto. }
+      { apply C'; auto. eapply Val.mxcmplu_bool_correct; eauto. }
 
 (* Ccompf *)
 - exploit (transl_compf_correct c0 x x0 lbl); eauto. intros (rs' & A & B & C).
@@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ Lemma transl_cond_int32u_correct:
   forall cmp rd r1 r2 k rs m,
   exists rs',
      exec_straight ge (basics_to_code (transl_cond_int32u cmp rd r1 r2 k)) rs m (basics_to_code k) rs' m
-  /\ rs'#rd = Val_cmpu cmp rs#r1 rs#r2
+  /\ rs'#rd = Val.mxcmpu cmp rs#r1 rs#r2
   /\ forall r, r <> PC -> r <> rd -> rs'#r = rs#r. 
 Proof.
   intros. destruct cmp; simpl. 
@@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ Lemma transl_cond_int64u_correct:
   forall cmp rd r1 r2 k rs m,
   exists rs',
      exec_straight ge (basics_to_code (transl_cond_int64u cmp rd r1 r2 k)) rs m (basics_to_code k) rs' m
-  /\ rs'#rd = Val_cmplu cmp rs#r1 rs#r2
+  /\ rs'#rd = Val.mxcmplu cmp rs#r1 rs#r2
   /\ forall r, r <> PC -> r <> rd -> rs'#r = rs#r. 
 Proof.
   intros. destruct cmp; simpl. 
@@ -1163,7 +1163,7 @@ Proof.
   split; intros; Simpl.
 Qed.
 
-Local Hint Resolve Val_cmpu_correct Val_cmplu_correct: core.
+Local Hint Resolve Val.mxcmpu_correct Val.mxcmplu_correct: core.
 
 Lemma transl_condimm_int32u_correct:
   forall cmp rd r1 n k rs m,
@@ -1279,12 +1279,12 @@ Proof.
 - econstructor; split. apply exec_straight_one; [simpl; eauto].
   split; intros; Simpl.
   unfold Val.cmpfs. unfold Val.cmpfs_bool. destruct (rs r1); auto. destruct (rs r2); auto. simpl.
-  cutrewrite (Cge = swap_comparison Cle); auto. rewrite Float32.cmp_swap.
+  replace (Cge) with (swap_comparison Cle); auto. rewrite Float32.cmp_swap.
   destruct (Float32.cmp _ _ _); auto.
 - econstructor; split. apply exec_straight_one; [simpl; eauto].
   split; intros; Simpl.
   unfold Val.cmpfs. unfold Val.cmpfs_bool. destruct (rs r1); auto. destruct (rs r2); auto. simpl.
-  cutrewrite (Clt = swap_comparison Cgt); auto. rewrite Float32.cmp_swap.
+  replace (Clt) with (swap_comparison Cgt); auto. rewrite Float32.cmp_swap.
   destruct (Float32.cmp _ _ _); auto.
 - econstructor; split. apply exec_straight_one; [simpl; eauto].
   split; intros; Simpl.
@@ -1345,12 +1345,12 @@ Proof.
 - econstructor; split. apply exec_straight_one; [simpl; eauto].
   split; intros; Simpl.
   unfold Val.cmpf. unfold Val.cmpf_bool. destruct (rs r1); auto. destruct (rs r2); auto. simpl.
-  cutrewrite (Cge = swap_comparison Cle); auto. rewrite Float.cmp_swap.
+  replace (Cge) with (swap_comparison Cle); auto. rewrite Float.cmp_swap.
   destruct (Float.cmp _ _ _); auto.
 - econstructor; split. apply exec_straight_one; [simpl; eauto].
   split; intros; Simpl.
   unfold Val.cmpf. unfold Val.cmpf_bool. destruct (rs r1); auto. destruct (rs r2); auto. simpl.
-  cutrewrite (Clt = swap_comparison Cgt); auto. rewrite Float.cmp_swap.
+  replace (Clt) with (swap_comparison Cgt); auto. rewrite Float.cmp_swap.
   destruct (Float.cmp _ _ _); auto.
 - econstructor; split. apply exec_straight_one; [simpl; eauto].
   split; intros; Simpl.
@@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ Proof.
   exploit transl_cond_int32s_correct; eauto. simpl. intros (rs' & A & B & C). exists rs'; eauto.
 + (* cmpu *)
   exploit transl_cond_int32u_correct; eauto. simpl. intros (rs' & A & B & C).
-  exists rs'; repeat split; eauto. rewrite B; eapply Val_cmpu_correct.
+  exists rs'; repeat split; eauto. rewrite B; eapply Val.mxcmpu_correct.
 + (* cmpimm *)
   apply transl_condimm_int32s_correct; eauto with asmgen.
 + (* cmpuimm *)
@@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ Proof.
 + (* cmplu *)
   exploit transl_cond_int64u_correct; eauto. simpl. intros (rs' & A & B & C).
   exists rs'; repeat split; eauto. rewrite B, MKTOT; eauto.
-  eapply Val_cmplu_correct.
+  eapply Val.mxcmplu_correct.
 + (* cmplimm *)
   exploit transl_condimm_int64s_correct; eauto. instantiate (1 := x); eauto with asmgen. simpl. 
   intros (rs' & A & B & C).

kvx/Asmvliw.v

@@ -853,58 +853,6 @@ Definition cmpu_for_btest (bt: btest) :=
   end.
 
 
-(* **** a few lemma on comparisons of unsigned (e.g. pointers) *)
-
-Definition Val_cmpu_bool cmp v1 v2: option bool :=
-  Val.cmpu_bool (fun _ _ => true) cmp v1 v2.
-
-Lemma Val_cmpu_bool_correct (m:mem) (cmp: comparison) (v1 v2: val) b:
-   (Val.cmpu_bool (Mem.valid_pointer m) cmp v1 v2) = Some b
-   -> (Val_cmpu_bool cmp v1 v2) = Some b.
-Proof.
-  intros; eapply Val.cmpu_bool_lessdef; (econstructor 1 || eauto).
-Qed.
-
-Definition Val_cmpu cmp v1 v2 := Val.of_optbool (Val_cmpu_bool cmp v1 v2).
-
-Lemma Val_cmpu_correct (m:mem) (cmp: comparison) (v1 v2: val):
-   Val.lessdef (Val.cmpu (Mem.valid_pointer m) cmp v1 v2)
-               (Val_cmpu cmp v1 v2).
-Proof.
-  unfold Val.cmpu, Val_cmpu.
-  remember (Val.cmpu_bool (Mem.valid_pointer m) cmp v1 v2) as ob.
-  destruct ob; cbn.
-  - erewrite Val_cmpu_bool_correct; eauto.
-    econstructor.
-  - econstructor.
-Qed.
-
-Definition Val_cmplu_bool (cmp: comparison) (v1 v2: val)
- := (Val.cmplu_bool (fun _ _ => true) cmp v1 v2).
-
-Lemma Val_cmplu_bool_correct (m:mem) (cmp: comparison) (v1 v2: val) b:
-   (Val.cmplu_bool (Mem.valid_pointer m) cmp v1 v2) = Some b
-   -> (Val_cmplu_bool cmp v1 v2) = Some b.
-Proof.
-  intros; eapply Val.cmplu_bool_lessdef; (econstructor 1 || eauto).
-Qed.
-
-Definition Val_cmplu cmp v1 v2 := Val.of_optbool (Val_cmplu_bool cmp v1 v2).
-
-Lemma Val_cmplu_correct (m:mem) (cmp: comparison) (v1 v2: val):
-   Val.lessdef (Val.maketotal (Val.cmplu (Mem.valid_pointer m) cmp v1 v2))
-               (Val_cmplu cmp v1 v2).
-Proof.
-  unfold Val.cmplu, Val_cmplu.
-  remember (Val.cmplu_bool (Mem.valid_pointer m) cmp v1 v2) as ob.
-  destruct ob as [b|]; cbn.
-  - erewrite Val_cmplu_bool_correct; eauto.
-    cbn. econstructor.
-  - econstructor.
-Qed.
-
-
-
 (** **** Comparing integers *)
 Definition compare_int (t: itest) (v1 v2: val): val :=
   match t with
@@ -914,12 +862,12 @@ Definition compare_int (t: itest) (v1 v2: val): val :=
   | ITge  => Val.cmp Cge v1 v2
   | ITle  => Val.cmp Cle v1 v2
   | ITgt  => Val.cmp Cgt v1 v2
-  | ITneu => Val_cmpu Cne v1 v2
-  | ITequ => Val_cmpu Ceq v1 v2
-  | ITltu => Val_cmpu Clt v1 v2
-  | ITgeu => Val_cmpu Cge v1 v2
-  | ITleu => Val_cmpu Cle v1 v2
-  | ITgtu => Val_cmpu Cgt v1 v2
+  | ITneu => Val.mxcmpu Cne v1 v2
+  | ITequ => Val.mxcmpu Ceq v1 v2
+  | ITltu => Val.mxcmpu Clt v1 v2
+  | ITgeu => Val.mxcmpu Cge v1 v2
+  | ITleu => Val.mxcmpu Cle v1 v2
+  | ITgtu => Val.mxcmpu Cgt v1 v2
   end.
 
 Definition compare_long (t: itest) (v1 v2: val): val :=
@@ -930,12 +878,12 @@ Definition compare_long (t: itest) (v1 v2: val): val :=
   | ITge  => Val.cmpl Cge v1 v2
   | ITle  => Val.cmpl Cle v1 v2
   | ITgt  => Val.cmpl Cgt v1 v2
-  | ITneu => Some (Val_cmplu Cne v1 v2)
-  | ITequ => Some (Val_cmplu Ceq v1 v2)
-  | ITltu => Some (Val_cmplu Clt v1 v2)
-  | ITgeu => Some (Val_cmplu Cge v1 v2)
-  | ITleu => Some (Val_cmplu Cle v1 v2)
-  | ITgtu => Some (Val_cmplu Cgt v1 v2)
+  | ITneu => Some (Val.mxcmplu Cne v1 v2)
+  | ITequ => Some (Val.mxcmplu Ceq v1 v2)
+  | ITltu => Some (Val.mxcmplu Clt v1 v2)
+  | ITgeu => Some (Val.mxcmplu Cge v1 v2)
+  | ITleu => Some (Val.mxcmplu Cle v1 v2)
+  | ITgtu => Some (Val.mxcmplu Cgt v1 v2)
   end in 
   match res with
   | Some v => v
@@ -1147,13 +1095,13 @@ Definition cmove bt v1 v2 v3 :=
 Definition cmoveu bt v1 v2 v3 :=
   match cmpu_for_btest bt with
   | (Some c, Int)  =>
-    match Val_cmpu_bool c v2 (Vint Int.zero) with
+    match Val.mxcmpu_bool c v2 (Vint Int.zero) with
     | None => Vundef
     | Some true => v3
     | Some false => v1
     end
   | (Some c, Long) =>
-    match Val_cmplu_bool c v2 (Vlong Int64.zero) with
+    match Val.mxcmplu_bool c v2 (Vlong Int64.zero) with
     | None => Vundef
     | Some true => v3
     | Some false => v1
@@ -1529,8 +1477,8 @@ Definition parexec_control (f: function) (oc: option control) (rsr rsw: regset)
       end
     | Pcbu bt r l => 
       match cmpu_for_btest bt with
-      | (Some c, Int) => par_eval_branch f l rsr rsw mw (Val_cmpu_bool c rsr#r (Vint (Int.repr 0)))
-      | (Some c, Long) => par_eval_branch f l rsr rsw mw (Val_cmplu_bool c rsr#r (Vlong (Int64.repr 0)))
+      | (Some c, Int) => par_eval_branch f l rsr rsw mw (Val.mxcmpu_bool c rsr#r (Vint (Int.repr 0)))
+      | (Some c, Long) => par_eval_branch f l rsr rsw mw (Val.mxcmplu_bool c rsr#r (Vlong (Int64.repr 0)))
       | (None, _) => Stuck
       end
     (**r Pseudo-instructions *)