Description / Overview

I noticed that the QObject::setProperty method prototype demands a const char * type for the first argument whereas the camitk::Property constructor and the getProperty method use a QString type.

I think it might be a good idea to implement a method looking like

//PropertyObject.h
virtual bool setProperty(const QString name, const QVariant &value);

//PropertyObject.cpp
bool PropertyObject::setProperty(const QString name, const QVariant &value) {
    if (propertiesMap.contains(name)) {
        return setProperty(name.toStdString().c_str(), value);
    }
    else {
        return false;
    }
}

, to be re-implemented in component and action.

(just like getPropertyValue (which I think should be re-implemented in component and action too (for the same reason)))

This would allow manipulating camitk properties only with QStrings and not with a mix of qstrings and char* types depending on the method being used.

Acceptance tests

• SetProperty works with QString One is able to set a property with the setProperty method using a QSting for the first argument
• All uses of setProperty in CamiTK and CEPs are updated CamiTK and CEPs compile without errors regarding the setProperty method

Track

One (or two) of:

Misc

• Automatic subscription of issue creator:

Do not forget to mark this issue as "confidential" by checking the tick box below (if appropriate)